TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Chromium has a thermal conductivity of 94 W/m-K...
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Chromium has a thermal conductivity of 94 W/m-K...
     
Posted by Jim (Selin Design) on August 17, 2012 at 12:12 PM
  This message has been viewed 255 times.
     
In Reply To Re: Been waiting for these goodies forever... posted by Tech@EPR on August 17, 2012 at 01:39 AM
     
Message That's pretty high as far as things go. For reference...

304 stainless is ~16 W/m-K
Powder coat would be ~1-2 W/m-K
mild steel (stock pipes) ~50 W/m-K
6061 aluminum ~160 W/m-K (much less than the pure metal)

So an aluminum tube with a thin layer of chrome that is about 2/3rds as conductive is going to suffer very little thermally. Even if the plating didn't achieve the full 94 W/m-K (alloying, microstructure, etc) it's still a small overall change by the rule of mixtures compared to steel piping and much much better than powdercoated aluminum.

www.selindesign.net

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.